Incoming search terms:

• patty j pittman superior court

HARTFORD, Conn.—

New help is on the way for children who are recovering from or vulnerable to trauma through a $3.2 million program developed with Yale University, state agency officials said Friday.

The initiative, paid for by a five-year federal grant, will allow the state to increase the number of therapy centers, screen children in the welfare system for psychological trauma and train child welfare workers to better recognize and support traumatized children. Advocates say roughly a third of the state’s children are victims of abuse, and the traumatic effects can be damaging and long lasting.

Joette Katz, the commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, said she has a strong interest in trauma therapy from her experiences as a public defender and a state Supreme Court justice.

“Every case I handled that had any involvement in the criminal justice system or the juvenile side of things you could see evidence of early trauma and the impact it has on later behavior in kids and families,” Katz said.

The initiative, called the Connecticut Collaborative on Effective Practices for Trauma, was announced at a statehouse event by the department, Yale and the nonprofit Child Health and Development Institute of Connecticut.

It is intended to nearly double the number of cognitive behavioral therapy centers for traumatized children. Currently, the state has 16 such centers, which combine certain interventions with behavioral therapy over multiple sessions.

“The expansion is to cover additional parts of the state and also to support the existing agencies to sustain and grow their capacity,” said Jason Lang of the child health institute.

Lang said the emphasis will be on screening children who have had contact with the child welfare system, but treatments for trauma are not restricted to those children.

Separately, the initiative will introduce child and family traumatic stress intervention, a method developed by the Yale Child Study Center, at 10 state clinics between 2014 and 2016. That method aims to reduce traumatic stress by encouraging children and their families to such about traumatic events immediately after they happen.

One in four children will suffer a traumatic event that is likely to lead to mental health problems, according to the nonprofit child health institute. Robert Franks, the institute’s vice president, said 34 out of every 100 children in the state are victims of abuse.

Connecticut is one of five states that received a grant from the U.S. Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau to expand its services for children who have been traumatized by events such as abuse and neglect, witnessing violence in their homes and communities, or being removed from their families.

The program will be introduced in segments throughout the five-year grant period, with the first year focusing on planning and the subsequent years focused on training workers on therapy methods and introducing those methods to communities throughout the state, according to Bert Plant, the state child welfare agency’s director of community mental health.

This story was published by: Courrant.com

Incoming search terms:

• family stresses intervention
• articles with joette katz picture in the late 90sconnecticut
• what states besides connecticut dcf recieved grant for child trauma
• federal intervene state ct
• DCF trauma grant
• dcf 2011 ct grants
• child and family traumatic stress intervention connecticut
• child and family traumatic stress intervention
• child and family stress intervention
• www any info on joette katts

Dear Ms. Edwards:

One last note on this issue before the New Britain Superior Court, I believe that the Statewide Grievance Committee and Attorney Quinn should have filed an amicus brief in my case to return my evidence.  Instead of my evidence being sent everywhere and then sending me a letter claiming Attorney Johnson brought it to them, Attorney Quinn and his panel should have presented before the court, knowing that a case was pending in the Superior Court, to file a motion for everyone to appear before the court.  At that time, they could have ordered Attorney Johnson to bring my evidence to court, hand it to me under oath to confirm that all the documents were returned.  That way, the court would have known that the evidence was not available to me, the Plaintiff, in time for me to file my motion for summary judgment.  The court could have also heard testimony as to what took place to see if sanctions were needed to be filed against Attorney Johnson and whatever else was needed.

By doing this, the court and the Statewide Grievance Panel, would have shown itself to be fair in the process and ensured that the evidence was safe and not tampered with.  This would have also protected my right of due process and equal protection of the law.

However, the way they did it was the same as spitting in my face and calling me the ”N” word.  What they did was meet together to discuss my fate and then ordered me to follow their plan.  It did not matter that I was the Plaintiff nor the fact that as an American Citizen of the United States that I have the same rights as they do.  What they have shown was racism at its best.  According to their conduct, especially Judge Pittman, I am no more than 3/5th of a person with no rights.  No one can tell me that they did not conspire together to violate my constitutional and civil rights.  And still, I also have an order from Judge Pittman, after I filed a complaint regarding Attorney Quinn, that she was removing that motion from the file.

Judge Pittman broke the law. It is easy to see that she covered up everyone’s illegal acts.  After receiving the short calendar, I filed for a subpoena for the FBI to testify.  The form is date stamped by the court.  Once she saw their letter and my subpoena request, she marked off my Motion for Contempt to protect her friends.  This is a crime.   John Whalen, in his government position, lied to protect everyone and Judge Pittman is using her gavel to seal the deal.

Monica fore

February 3, 2012

Ms. Remy Edwards
Judicial Review Council
505 Hudson Street, 1st floor
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: EX PARTE MEETINGS: DEPRIVATION OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS

Dear Ms. Edwards:

I am informing your office that Judge Pittman and others are conducting ex parte meetings regarding my case – Fore v. Tunxis Community College-  filed in the New Britain Superior Court.  Meetings and discussions are going on to decide my fate without my involvement.   On yesterday, February 2, 2012, the clerk at the court informed me that Judge Pittman removed my Motion For Contempt without informing either party in the case.   The case was scheduled on the February 6, 2012 short calendar to be argued in court.  The clerk informed me that it was removed and that the summary judgment is going forward on Monday.  The question is, “what took place on yesterday that caused the motion to be removed?”  Certainly the defendant and I didn’t get called into court or spoke jointly on the phone with the court to discuss the motion.  Something is wrong with this.  Clearly, one can believe that there was a discussion of some type as to this motion and that it was decided upon to be removed without the parties knowledge.

If the court removed it because John Whalen said there is no criminal activity going on, then that should be addressed in court as I can prove that he did not conduct an investigation.  He abused his authority to cover up the wrong doing of his friends.  And still, he shouldn’t be afraid to come to court to testify about his findings under oath.  If he and others told the truth, than that is what the court is for.  Testify to the truth of the events that went on in this case.  No one should be afraid if they are telling the truth.

These acts further violate the law and are intended to conceal evidence in the case.  Blocking the court, withholding motions, testimony and other illegal acts to obstruct justice is against the law.  And still, no one is concerned about missing state records or the fact that no one investigated what really happened at Tunxis Community College.  This college gets state and federal dollars.  It is against the law for its administrators to discriminate in its hiring practices.  It is against the law for the court and others to further the discriminatory conduct by lying and conspiring to fix the case for the defendants to cover up their illegal acts.  I cannot stop the gavel or people abusing their pen power.  The only thing I have the power to do is to tell the truth.  That is what I have done only to have government employees lie for each other to block the truth from coming out.

I ask that my complaint to your office be taken seriously and that Judge Pittman be brought before the public to testify of her misconduct in the case.  I will provide a full copy of my complaint that was made to the Office of the Chief State Attorney with the exhibits to confirm my statements.  Furthermore, I will gladly provide my cell phone text messages for your review to confirm the text messages from Attorney Johnson to me.  You may also check the Statewide Grievance Committees files to see that Attorney Johnson was suspended during the time in question and not registered.  Attorney Elizabeth Rowe and another worker at the grievance office told me that she was not registered and still not in good standing after I complained to them about Attorney Quinn’s panel “no probable cause” finding when the documented facts showed that Attorney Johnson did commit the acts.

Monica Fore

Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2012 8:27 am
Subject: JOHN WHALEN: OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY
February, 3, 2012

Joint Committee on Judiciary
Room 2500, Legislative Office Building
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: JUDGE PITTMAN AND THE CONSPIRACY TO FIX THE CASE OF FORE V. TUNXIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Dear Joint Committee:

On Monday, February 6, 2012, Judge Pittman will finalize her decision in the case of Fore v. Tunxis Community College.  The hearing is for the parties Motion For Summary Judgment.  The case has been fixed for the Defendant Tunxis Community College.

This letter comes before your committee to request a full investigation in the case as government officials conspired together with my former Attorney, Tricia Jessica Johnson to fix the case for Tunxis.  My evidence in the case is missing and people have lied to cover up the misconduct.  Below you will find two letters.  One is the response from John Whalen, Office of the Chief State Attorney and the other is a copy of page one of my complaint to Office of the Chief State Attorney.  The complaint was also filed with the FBI.  What I ask is for your office to notice is the date stamps on both of the documents.  My complaint is date stamped January 19, 2012.  John Whalen’s response letter is dated January 26, 2012.  Please notice that my complaint is about Conspiracy 53a-48(a); Vicarious Liability 53a-8(a); Bribery 53a-147; Bribe Receiving 53a-148; Perjury 53a-156(a); False Statements 53a-157b; Larceny 53a-119; Criminal Attempt 53a-49; Misapplication of Property 53a-129; Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence 53a-155; Criminal Misrepresentation 53a-302; Coercion 53a-192(a)(1), etc; Obstruction of Justice; Color of law; Deprivation of Rights and Conspiracy to Commit Offense or To Defraud U.S.

I inform your committee that there is no way that John Whalen could have conducted a thorough, fair and honest investigation with all the exhibits I presented without talking to people and getting their statements. Nor could he have come to an honest decision without reviewing the defendants deposition tapes for September 22, 2012 and October 13, 2012.   John Whalen lied to help his friends and colleagues.   Another fact is that he never called me in or others in to inspect cell phone records to prove the text messages that were sent between Attorney Johnson and I. Rev. Daniel Collins, Rev. Moss, and others even have text messages regarding Attorney Johnson’s misconduct in the case.  These text messages are mentioned in my  complaint and were to be used as exhibits in the case.   If you notice the date stamps on the documents you will see that there is only a six days involved in his [investigation].   There is no way he could have subpoenaed the cell phone records from both of our cell phone companies in six days.  In fact, he doesn’t even have the name of my cell phone company to have called them for information.   I work around criminal defense attorneys and know that he should have inspected the cell phone records and messages in the complaint.  He should have checked the IP addresses to confirm where the messages came from, date, time and what was said in order to conduct a real investigation.  And to go further, I have studied criminal justice and learned how to conduct investigation was a part of the program.  John Whalen purposely failed to conduct an investigation and lied about his outcome.  This is a color of law violation.

Now Judge Pittman is using her gavel to finalize the conspiratorial act.  She removed my Motion For Contempt to cover up everyone’s misconduct.  She is making sure there are no transcripts (no record) of the illegal acts taking place in her court.  The evidence does reveal that Attorney Johnson conspired with the defendants to aid in fixing the case for the defendants.  She lied about her appearance and then withdrew my case without telling me.  I then had to fight to get the case back into court.  And her misconduct continued throughout the time she was involved in the case.  She was suspended by the Statewide Grievance Committee.  She failed to register.  The deposition dvd will show her conduct with Attorney Margulies.  The case is fixed and the misconduct has been covered up.  It will be sealed on Monday, February 6, 2012 by Judge Pittman.  Judge Pittman is also covering up her illegal acts by ensuring there are no transcripts for anyone to know what really happened.  This is a clear violation of the law and my constitutional and civil rights.

I ask for a full investigation as it is against the law for Judge Pittman to aid others in conspiring to fix a case in court.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have or evidence you may need. See documents below. Notice the date and date stamp on the documents.

Sincerely,

Monica Fore

Incoming search terms:

• monica fore
• monica fore connecticut
• tunxis community college court case
• constitutional deprivation
• florida constitution deprivation of rights
• fore vs tunxis community college
• monica fore tunxis

On Thursday, February 2, 2012, I was told by the clerk at the New Britain Superior Court that Judge Pittman removed the Motion For Contempt from the short calendar.  Clearly, this was an exparte decision as nothing was said in court nor did she inform the parties as to why she removed the case.  The question is, why is Judge Pittman still handling my case.  Sure, everyone is clearing her although they know the issues are true.  But for the mere fact that complaints are filed against her shows that she cannot be impartial in the case.   She is using her gavel now as a personal vendetta.  Friends are clearing each other.  In fact, the date on John Whalen’s letter and the date stamp on my complaint to their office confirms there was no investigation.  See Motion To Recuse below.

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, after receiving the short calendar, I contacted the FBI and others including Dori Bruce (CHRO) to ask if they would testify in the Motion For Contempt to confirm my story that issues were real and that they fall under the criminal statutes.  The FBI sent me a letter outlining the steps I needed to take in order to have them appear in court.  One of the requirements was a subpoena.  I took the letter from their office to the court and filled out the form for the subpoenas.  Knowing that John Whalen and others were dishonest  about their investigations, I requested subpoenas for Attorney Johnson, Attorney Margulies, Attorney Margaret Chapple, John Whalen, Brandon Smith Reporting Services, Jacqueline McCauley, Michael Bowler, Attorney John Quinn, the West Hartford Police Department, and Robert Brothers to come to court to testify about their investigation decisions.

Judge Pittman covered up their acts.  The criminal complaint also involved her acts in the case.  It is questionable as to why she removed the Motion For Contempt from the short calendar when she is named in the criminal complaint.  And still, a formal complaint was also made to the FBI.  I also submitted the September 22, 2011 Defendants Deposition DVD to the FBI so they could see the conduct that when on in the deposition.  Attorney Johnson was conspiring with Attorney Margulies to fix the case.  The video will show that Attorney Johnson also did not provide the documents in the deposition of which was court ordered by Judge Pittman.  See document below for DATE STAMP on subpoena.  John Whalen did not conduct any kind of investigation.  He lied.  This is a color of law violation.  The Motion For Contempt was removed from the calendar by Judge Pittman to cover up the conspiracy. The question I ask now is, “why not allow the motion to go forward, bring these individuals to court, allow them to testify under oath about the documents and incidents that took place to see if I am really lying about things?  Please notice date stamp.

Incoming search terms:

• john whalen state of connecticut
• john whalen state trooper
• john r whalen ct chief state attorney office
• john whalen attorney
• john whalen ct
• John Whalen of the Department of State
• WHALEN STATE POLICE POST

February, 3, 2012

Joint Committee on Judiciary
Room 2500, Legislative Office Building
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: JUDGE PITTMAN AND THE CONSPIRACY TO FIX THE CASE OF FORE V. TUNXIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Dear Joint Committee:

On Monday, February 6, 2012, Judge Pittman will finalize her decision in the case of Fore v. Tunxis Community College.  The hearing is for the parties Motion For Summary Judgment.  The case has been fixed for the Defendant Tunxis Community College.

This letter comes before your committee to request a full investigation in the case as government officials conspired together with my former Attorney, Tricia Jessica Johnson to fix the case for Tunxis.  My evidence in the case is missing and people have lied to cover up the misconduct.  Below you will find two letters.  One is the response from John Whalen, Office of the Chief State Attorney and the other is a copy of page one of my complaint to Office of the Chief State Attorney.  The complaint was also filed with the FBI.  What I ask is for your office to notice is the date stamps on both of the documents.  My complaint is date stamped January 19, 2012.  John Whalen’s response letter is dated January 26, 2012.  Please notice that my complaint is about Conspiracy 53a-48(a); Vicarious Liability 53a-8(a); Bribery 53a-147; Bribe Recieving 53a-148; Perjury 53a-156(a); False Statements 53a-157b; Larceny 53a-119; Criminal Attempt 53a-49; Misapplication of Property 53a-129; Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence 53a-155; Criminal Misrepresentation 53a-302; Coercion 53a-192(a)(1), etc; Obstruction of Justice; Color of law; Deprivation of Rights and Conspiracy to Commit Offense or To Defraud U.S.

I inform your committee that there is no way that John Whalen could have conducted a thorough, fair and honest investigation with all the exhibtis I presented without talking to people and getting their statements. Nor could he have come to an honest decision without reviewing the defendants deposition tapes for September 22, 2012 and October 13, 2012.   John Whalen lied to help his friends and colleagues.   Another fact is that he never called me in or others in to inspect cell phone records to prove the text messages that were sent between Attorney Johnson and I. Rev. Daniel Collins, Rev. Moss, and others even have text messages regarding Attorney Johnson’s misconduct in the case.  These text messages are mentioned in my  complaint and were to be used as exhibits in the case.   If you notice the date stamps on the documents you will see that there is only a six days involved in his [investigation].   There is no way he could have subpoenaed the cell phone records from both of our cell phone companies in six days.  In fact, he doesn’t even have the name of my cell phone company to have called them for information.   I work around criminal defense attorneys and know that he should have inspected the cell phone records and messages in the complaint.  He should have checked the IP addresses to confirm where the messages came from, date, time and what was said in order to conduct a real investigation.  And to go further, I have studied criminal justice and learned how to conduct investigation was a part of the program.  John Whalen purposely failed to conduct an investigation and lied about his outcome.  This is a color of law violation.

Now Judge Pittman is using her gavel to finalize the conspiratoral act.  She removed my Motion For Contempt to cover up everyone’s misconduct.  She is making sure there are no transcripts (no record) of the illegal acts taking place in her court.  The evidence does reveal that Attorney Johnson conspired with the defendants to aid in fixing the case for the defendants.  She lied about her appearance and then withdrew my case without telling me.  I then had to fight to get the case back into court.  And her misconduct continued throughout the time she was involved in the case.  She was suspended by the Statewide Grievance Committee.  She failed to register.  The deposition dvd will show her conduct with Attorney Margulies.  The case is fixed and the misconduct has been covered up.  It will be sealed on Monday, February 6, 2012 by Judge Pittman.  Judge Pittman is also covering up her illegal acts by ensuring there are no transcripts for anyone to know what really happened.  This is a clear violation of the law and my constitutional and civil rights.

I ask for a full investigation as it is against the law for Judge Pittman to aid others in conspiring to fix a case in court.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have or evidence you may need. See documents below. Notice the date and date stamp on the documents.

Sincerely,

Monica Fore

Incoming search terms:

• lawyer and judge conspired to fix a case
• who has dated jon whalen

At a young age you were taught not to touch a hot stove, clearly you have not learned not to touch something hot.

As a Judge you swore to uphold the law, that you have not done.  As a Judge the people you are supposed to protect you hurt,  the people are thrown to the wayside. The truth of the wrong that has been done will soon be known. We all have choices and you have made yours, to protect your friends not the people you swore to. It is as if everyone is trying to cover for one another, a lie can only go for so long.

Incoming search terms:

• judge patty ptiman ct
• judge pittman new britain ct
• judge patty jenkins pittman
• patti pittman judge
• connecticut judge pittman new britain
• judge pittman connecticut