I would just like to point out that all of DCF’s “professional witnesses” are all people who were paid by DCF to testify on their behalf; how is this even legal?. The only non biased witness we had was ___, who had no concerns what so ever about John Doe bond or ability to parent. I believe that his child was promised to the foster family at birth when CHINS was filed. Jon Doe had no rights to his daughter until paternity was proven so I don’t understand how their delay in identifying parentage can now be held against him.  DCF makes comments like “Jeff made a threatening phone call”, yet there are no specifics given of what exactly was threatening about the calls. The truth is that DCF doesn’t like to be questioned or challenged in any way. I can tell you that there is nothing more threatening than taking a persons child from them and then making them dance in circles while they publicly intimidate, harass and demean them. We have sent 4 letters to the commissioners office in regards to these allegations (with specifics) but there has been no interest in anyone hearing our side of the story. If they’re going to make allegations about John Doe threatening them then the least they could do is to humor us with the facts.

This was the most meaningful of the Supreme Court Lawyers Responses:

“Dealing with DCF can be trying since they tend to hold all the cards and are used to getting their way”. For Now that is…..

Incoming search terms:

• humor
• image of humor
• humor pictures
• humor fotos
• humor pics
• Facts about dcf
• pic for humor