28 USCS   453

 

                                                        IS BEING IGNORED

            WITH ARROGANCE AND IMPUNITY

                           BY OUTLAW JUDGES !

 

                                                                        

 

 

                                                                   28 USCS 453: 

              Solemn Oath of Justices and Judges

 

  Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath

          or affirmation before performing the duties of his office:

 

 

       ”I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice

    without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the

   rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform

   all the duties incumbent upon me as ________ under the Constitution and

                   laws of the United States.  So help me God.”

 

                                        

                 

 

      MUST HOLD EVERY JUDGE ACCOUNTABLE

          TO THEIR SOLEMN OATH OF OFFICE 

            THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAW 

 

                                            

 No position can be more clear than that all federal judges are bound

    by The  solemn obligation of religion to regulate their decisions

agreeably to Constitution of United States, and that it is the standard

         of their  determination in all cases that come before them. 

                          United States v Callender (1800, CCD Va) 25 F Cas 239,No 14709.

 

      As John Adams put it in the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights: “It is essential to the preservation of the rights

    of  every individual, his life, liberty, property and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and

    administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as free, impartial and independent as

    the lot of humanity will admit.”

 

      The Founders well understood how essential it would be to find judges who could live up to the promises contained

    in the judicial oath that every federal judge has taken since the early years of the republic: to “administer justice

    without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and … impartially discharge and perform

    all the duties incumbent on me…under the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

 

  The Founders, with their realistic views of human nature, would not have been surprised to see judges who

sometimes faltered in their ability to live up to those high ideals. What would have surprised them, though,

would be the appearance of a breed of judges who seem to disagree with the principles they pledged to uphold,

judges who seem to have adopted a new oath for themselves that goes something like this: “I do solemnly swear

to administer justice with close attention to the individual characteristics of the parties, to show compassion to

those I deem deserving, and to discharge my duties according to my personal understanding of the Constitution,

the laws of the United States, and such higher laws as have been revealed to me.”

If THEY WERE ONLY DOING WHAT THEY SWORE TO DO