Dear Ms. Edwards:

One last note on this issue before the New Britain Superior Court, I believe that the Statewide Grievance Committee and Attorney Quinn should have filed an amicus brief in my case to return my evidence.  Instead of my evidence being sent everywhere and then sending me a letter claiming Attorney Johnson brought it to them, Attorney Quinn and his panel should have presented before the court, knowing that a case was pending in the Superior Court, to file a motion for everyone to appear before the court.  At that time, they could have ordered Attorney Johnson to bring my evidence to court, hand it to me under oath to confirm that all the documents were returned.  That way, the court would have known that the evidence was not available to me, the Plaintiff, in time for me to file my motion for summary judgment.  The court could have also heard testimony as to what took place to see if sanctions were needed to be filed against Attorney Johnson and whatever else was needed.

By doing this, the court and the Statewide Grievance Panel, would have shown itself to be fair in the process and ensured that the evidence was safe and not tampered with.  This would have also protected my right of due process and equal protection of the law.

However, the way they did it was the same as spitting in my face and calling me the ”N” word.  What they did was meet together to discuss my fate and then ordered me to follow their plan.  It did not matter that I was the Plaintiff nor the fact that as an American Citizen of the United States that I have the same rights as they do.  What they have shown was racism at its best.  According to their conduct, especially Judge Pittman, I am no more than 3/5th of a person with no rights.  No one can tell me that they did not conspire together to violate my constitutional and civil rights.  And still, I also have an order from Judge Pittman, after I filed a complaint regarding Attorney Quinn, that she was removing that motion from the file.

Judge Pittman broke the law. It is easy to see that she covered up everyone’s illegal acts.  After receiving the short calendar, I filed for a subpoena for the FBI to testify.  The form is date stamped by the court.  Once she saw their letter and my subpoena request, she marked off my Motion for Contempt to protect her friends.  This is a crime.   John Whalen, in his government position, lied to protect everyone and Judge Pittman is using her gavel to seal the deal.

Monica fore

February 3, 2012

Ms. Remy Edwards
Judicial Review Council
505 Hudson Street, 1st floor
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: EX PARTE MEETINGS: DEPRIVATION OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS

Dear Ms. Edwards:

I am informing your office that Judge Pittman and others are conducting ex parte meetings regarding my case – Fore v. Tunxis Community College-  filed in the New Britain Superior Court.  Meetings and discussions are going on to decide my fate without my involvement.   On yesterday, February 2, 2012, the clerk at the court informed me that Judge Pittman removed my Motion For Contempt without informing either party in the case.   The case was scheduled on the February 6, 2012 short calendar to be argued in court.  The clerk informed me that it was removed and that the summary judgment is going forward on Monday.  The question is, “what took place on yesterday that caused the motion to be removed?”  Certainly the defendant and I didn’t get called into court or spoke jointly on the phone with the court to discuss the motion.  Something is wrong with this.  Clearly, one can believe that there was a discussion of some type as to this motion and that it was decided upon to be removed without the parties knowledge.

If the court removed it because John Whalen said there is no criminal activity going on, then that should be addressed in court as I can prove that he did not conduct an investigation.  He abused his authority to cover up the wrong doing of his friends.  And still, he shouldn’t be afraid to come to court to testify about his findings under oath.  If he and others told the truth, than that is what the court is for.  Testify to the truth of the events that went on in this case.  No one should be afraid if they are telling the truth.

These acts further violate the law and are intended to conceal evidence in the case.  Blocking the court, withholding motions, testimony and other illegal acts to obstruct justice is against the law.  And still, no one is concerned about missing state records or the fact that no one investigated what really happened at Tunxis Community College.  This college gets state and federal dollars.  It is against the law for its administrators to discriminate in its hiring practices.  It is against the law for the court and others to further the discriminatory conduct by lying and conspiring to fix the case for the defendants to cover up their illegal acts.  I cannot stop the gavel or people abusing their pen power.  The only thing I have the power to do is to tell the truth.  That is what I have done only to have government employees lie for each other to block the truth from coming out.

I ask that my complaint to your office be taken seriously and that Judge Pittman be brought before the public to testify of her misconduct in the case.  I will provide a full copy of my complaint that was made to the Office of the Chief State Attorney with the exhibits to confirm my statements.  Furthermore, I will gladly provide my cell phone text messages for your review to confirm the text messages from Attorney Johnson to me.  You may also check the Statewide Grievance Committees files to see that Attorney Johnson was suspended during the time in question and not registered.  Attorney Elizabeth Rowe and another worker at the grievance office told me that she was not registered and still not in good standing after I complained to them about Attorney Quinn’s panel “no probable cause” finding when the documented facts showed that Attorney Johnson did commit the acts.

Monica Fore

Sent: Fri, Feb 3, 2012 8:27 am
Subject: JOHN WHALEN: OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY
February, 3, 2012

Joint Committee on Judiciary
Room 2500, Legislative Office Building
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: JUDGE PITTMAN AND THE CONSPIRACY TO FIX THE CASE OF FORE V. TUNXIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Dear Joint Committee:

On Monday, February 6, 2012, Judge Pittman will finalize her decision in the case of Fore v. Tunxis Community College.  The hearing is for the parties Motion For Summary Judgment.  The case has been fixed for the Defendant Tunxis Community College.

This letter comes before your committee to request a full investigation in the case as government officials conspired together with my former Attorney, Tricia Jessica Johnson to fix the case for Tunxis.  My evidence in the case is missing and people have lied to cover up the misconduct.  Below you will find two letters.  One is the response from John Whalen, Office of the Chief State Attorney and the other is a copy of page one of my complaint to Office of the Chief State Attorney.  The complaint was also filed with the FBI.  What I ask is for your office to notice is the date stamps on both of the documents.  My complaint is date stamped January 19, 2012.  John Whalen’s response letter is dated January 26, 2012.  Please notice that my complaint is about Conspiracy 53a-48(a); Vicarious Liability 53a-8(a); Bribery 53a-147; Bribe Receiving 53a-148; Perjury 53a-156(a); False Statements 53a-157b; Larceny 53a-119; Criminal Attempt 53a-49; Misapplication of Property 53a-129; Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence 53a-155; Criminal Misrepresentation 53a-302; Coercion 53a-192(a)(1), etc; Obstruction of Justice; Color of law; Deprivation of Rights and Conspiracy to Commit Offense or To Defraud U.S.

I inform your committee that there is no way that John Whalen could have conducted a thorough, fair and honest investigation with all the exhibits I presented without talking to people and getting their statements. Nor could he have come to an honest decision without reviewing the defendants deposition tapes for September 22, 2012 and October 13, 2012.   John Whalen lied to help his friends and colleagues.   Another fact is that he never called me in or others in to inspect cell phone records to prove the text messages that were sent between Attorney Johnson and I. Rev. Daniel Collins, Rev. Moss, and others even have text messages regarding Attorney Johnson’s misconduct in the case.  These text messages are mentioned in my  complaint and were to be used as exhibits in the case.   If you notice the date stamps on the documents you will see that there is only a six days involved in his [investigation].   There is no way he could have subpoenaed the cell phone records from both of our cell phone companies in six days.  In fact, he doesn’t even have the name of my cell phone company to have called them for information.   I work around criminal defense attorneys and know that he should have inspected the cell phone records and messages in the complaint.  He should have checked the IP addresses to confirm where the messages came from, date, time and what was said in order to conduct a real investigation.  And to go further, I have studied criminal justice and learned how to conduct investigation was a part of the program.  John Whalen purposely failed to conduct an investigation and lied about his outcome.  This is a color of law violation.

Now Judge Pittman is using her gavel to finalize the conspiratorial act.  She removed my Motion For Contempt to cover up everyone’s misconduct.  She is making sure there are no transcripts (no record) of the illegal acts taking place in her court.  The evidence does reveal that Attorney Johnson conspired with the defendants to aid in fixing the case for the defendants.  She lied about her appearance and then withdrew my case without telling me.  I then had to fight to get the case back into court.  And her misconduct continued throughout the time she was involved in the case.  She was suspended by the Statewide Grievance Committee.  She failed to register.  The deposition dvd will show her conduct with Attorney Margulies.  The case is fixed and the misconduct has been covered up.  It will be sealed on Monday, February 6, 2012 by Judge Pittman.  Judge Pittman is also covering up her illegal acts by ensuring there are no transcripts for anyone to know what really happened.  This is a clear violation of the law and my constitutional and civil rights.

I ask for a full investigation as it is against the law for Judge Pittman to aid others in conspiring to fix a case in court.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have or evidence you may need. See documents below. Notice the date and date stamp on the documents.

Sincerely,

Monica Fore

Incoming search terms:

• monica fore
• monica fore connecticut
• tunxis community college court case
• deprivation civil rights
• monica fore hartford ct

On Thursday, February 2, 2012, I was told by the clerk at the New Britain Superior Court that Judge Pittman removed the Motion For Contempt from the short calendar.  Clearly, this was an exparte decision as nothing was said in court nor did she inform the parties as to why she removed the case.  The question is, why is Judge Pittman still handling my case.  Sure, everyone is clearing her although they know the issues are true.  But for the mere fact that complaints are filed against her shows that she cannot be impartial in the case.   She is using her gavel now as a personal vendetta.  Friends are clearing each other.  In fact, the date on John Whalen’s letter and the date stamp on my complaint to their office confirms there was no investigation.  See Motion To Recuse below.

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, after receiving the short calendar, I contacted the FBI and others including Dori Bruce (CHRO) to ask if they would testify in the Motion For Contempt to confirm my story that issues were real and that they fall under the criminal statutes.  The FBI sent me a letter outlining the steps I needed to take in order to have them appear in court.  One of the requirements was a subpoena.  I took the letter from their office to the court and filled out the form for the subpoenas.  Knowing that John Whalen and others were dishonest  about their investigations, I requested subpoenas for Attorney Johnson, Attorney Margulies, Attorney Margaret Chapple, John Whalen, Brandon Smith Reporting Services, Jacqueline McCauley, Michael Bowler, Attorney John Quinn, the West Hartford Police Department, and Robert Brothers to come to court to testify about their investigation decisions.

Judge Pittman covered up their acts.  The criminal complaint also involved her acts in the case.  It is questionable as to why she removed the Motion For Contempt from the short calendar when she is named in the criminal complaint.  And still, a formal complaint was also made to the FBI.  I also submitted the September 22, 2011 Defendants Deposition DVD to the FBI so they could see the conduct that when on in the deposition.  Attorney Johnson was conspiring with Attorney Margulies to fix the case.  The video will show that Attorney Johnson also did not provide the documents in the deposition of which was court ordered by Judge Pittman.  See document below for DATE STAMP on subpoena.  John Whalen did not conduct any kind of investigation.  He lied.  This is a color of law violation.  The Motion For Contempt was removed from the calendar by Judge Pittman to cover up the conspiracy. The question I ask now is, “why not allow the motion to go forward, bring these individuals to court, allow them to testify under oath about the documents and incidents that took place to see if I am really lying about things?  Please notice date stamp.

Incoming search terms:

• john whalen state trooper

February, 3, 2012

Joint Committee on Judiciary
Room 2500, Legislative Office Building
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: JUDGE PITTMAN AND THE CONSPIRACY TO FIX THE CASE OF FORE V. TUNXIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Dear Joint Committee:

On Monday, February 6, 2012, Judge Pittman will finalize her decision in the case of Fore v. Tunxis Community College.  The hearing is for the parties Motion For Summary Judgment.  The case has been fixed for the Defendant Tunxis Community College.

This letter comes before your committee to request a full investigation in the case as government officials conspired together with my former Attorney, Tricia Jessica Johnson to fix the case for Tunxis.  My evidence in the case is missing and people have lied to cover up the misconduct.  Below you will find two letters.  One is the response from John Whalen, Office of the Chief State Attorney and the other is a copy of page one of my complaint to Office of the Chief State Attorney.  The complaint was also filed with the FBI.  What I ask is for your office to notice is the date stamps on both of the documents.  My complaint is date stamped January 19, 2012.  John Whalen’s response letter is dated January 26, 2012.  Please notice that my complaint is about Conspiracy 53a-48(a); Vicarious Liability 53a-8(a); Bribery 53a-147; Bribe Recieving 53a-148; Perjury 53a-156(a); False Statements 53a-157b; Larceny 53a-119; Criminal Attempt 53a-49; Misapplication of Property 53a-129; Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence 53a-155; Criminal Misrepresentation 53a-302; Coercion 53a-192(a)(1), etc; Obstruction of Justice; Color of law; Deprivation of Rights and Conspiracy to Commit Offense or To Defraud U.S.

I inform your committee that there is no way that John Whalen could have conducted a thorough, fair and honest investigation with all the exhibtis I presented without talking to people and getting their statements. Nor could he have come to an honest decision without reviewing the defendants deposition tapes for September 22, 2012 and October 13, 2012.   John Whalen lied to help his friends and colleagues.   Another fact is that he never called me in or others in to inspect cell phone records to prove the text messages that were sent between Attorney Johnson and I. Rev. Daniel Collins, Rev. Moss, and others even have text messages regarding Attorney Johnson’s misconduct in the case.  These text messages are mentioned in my  complaint and were to be used as exhibits in the case.   If you notice the date stamps on the documents you will see that there is only a six days involved in his [investigation].   There is no way he could have subpoenaed the cell phone records from both of our cell phone companies in six days.  In fact, he doesn’t even have the name of my cell phone company to have called them for information.   I work around criminal defense attorneys and know that he should have inspected the cell phone records and messages in the complaint.  He should have checked the IP addresses to confirm where the messages came from, date, time and what was said in order to conduct a real investigation.  And to go further, I have studied criminal justice and learned how to conduct investigation was a part of the program.  John Whalen purposely failed to conduct an investigation and lied about his outcome.  This is a color of law violation.

Now Judge Pittman is using her gavel to finalize the conspiratoral act.  She removed my Motion For Contempt to cover up everyone’s misconduct.  She is making sure there are no transcripts (no record) of the illegal acts taking place in her court.  The evidence does reveal that Attorney Johnson conspired with the defendants to aid in fixing the case for the defendants.  She lied about her appearance and then withdrew my case without telling me.  I then had to fight to get the case back into court.  And her misconduct continued throughout the time she was involved in the case.  She was suspended by the Statewide Grievance Committee.  She failed to register.  The deposition dvd will show her conduct with Attorney Margulies.  The case is fixed and the misconduct has been covered up.  It will be sealed on Monday, February 6, 2012 by Judge Pittman.  Judge Pittman is also covering up her illegal acts by ensuring there are no transcripts for anyone to know what really happened.  This is a clear violation of the law and my constitutional and civil rights.

I ask for a full investigation as it is against the law for Judge Pittman to aid others in conspiring to fix a case in court.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have or evidence you may need. See documents below. Notice the date and date stamp on the documents.

Sincerely,

Monica Fore

At a young age you were taught not to touch a hot stove, clearly you have not learned not to touch something hot.

As a Judge you swore to uphold the law, that you have not done.  As a Judge the people you are supposed to protect you hurt,  the people are thrown to the wayside. The truth of the wrong that has been done will soon be known. We all have choices and you have made yours, to protect your friends not the people you swore to. It is as if everyone is trying to cover for one another, a lie can only go for so long.

Incoming search terms:

• patty pittman ct
• true story connecticut

Incoming search terms:

• welfare fraud stories

Said by  By JON LENDER, jlender@courant.com, The Hartford Courant. He has got it right, THANK YOU Jon Lender

One of four new family support magistrates named by Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy will replace a controversial appointee of former Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell — former Old Lyme Republican Town Chairman Christopher Oliveira.

Oliveira, once a candidate for state Senate, will continue serving as a magistrate until early September, when he’ll be replaced by Jane Grossman, a Democratic Malloy appointee. She is a longtime staff attorney for New Haven Legal Assistance who has served in numerous capacities for the courts and advisory boards concerning the legal needs of low-income families.

Like all nine family support magistrates, Grossman will serve a three-year term. Legislative confirmation is not required; it’s a straight gubernatorial appointment, viewed at least partly as a political patronage plum over the years. The $121,615-a-year magistrates decide cases involving child support, alimony, visitation and paternity.

When Rell named Oliveira 3½ years ago, questions immediately arose about his qualifications. He had appeared as a lawyer in only a few civil cases. Also, he had resigned from a family relations counselor trainee’s job in the Middletown courthouse in 2004 after an internal investigation found that he used office equipment and materials for personal and political purposes. Later, it also was revealed that he failed to mention the 2004 incident on a background questionnaire he’d submitted to Rell’s office.

His term expired in January, but magistrates serve until their replacement takes office.

Malloy wrote Oliveira a letter Friday, thanking him for his service. “On behalf of the people of the state of Connecticut, please accept my thanks for your years of service to the state. … Please continue in your current capacity through September 5, 2011. You have my best wishes for the future.”

In addition to Grossman, the new magistrate appointees are:

•Michael Ferguson of Meriden, a Democrat, who will replace magistrate Linda Wihbey of Waterbury, a Republican, in September.

•Frederic Gilman of East Hampton, a Democrat, who in September will replace former magistrate Richard Adams, a Middlefield Republican who retired and assumed status as a part-time referee to handle magistrate cases in March.

•Norma Sanchez-Figueroa of South Windsor, a Democrat. In September she will replace Harris Lifshitz, a Glastonbury Democrat who is retiring to assume status as a part-time referee.

A Malloy spokesman said months ago that the governor wanted to address the concern that none of the existing family support magistrates is a member of any minority group. Two of Malloy’s four appointees are members of minority groups; Sanchez-Figueroa is Latino and Ferguson is African American.

The other magistrates whose terms had expired were reappointed by Malloy.

Lifshitz, the 24-year veteran magistrate now assuming referee’s status, attracted attention recently for what Courant columnist Rick Green in March called “a habit of throwing real and alleged deadbeats in the slammer for weeks and months.” Green reported that Lifshitz was once found by a judge to be “clearly erroneous” for jailing a man who couldn’t pay the full child support he owed.

In April, Lifshitz said: “I have been a family support magistrate for the past 24 years, since the magistrate system was first established in Connecticut. … I have decided hundreds of thousands of cases and authored over a hundred written decisions. … I listen to all sides of each and every case.” This is a STRAIGHT lie,he does not listen to all sides, he is a one sided selfish person. He will SCREAM how HE is the MAGISTRATE, it is HIS COURT. Never does he even ASK about a child, this man does not care. If you are homeless with no job and you need to modify your court order, forget it. I have seen this man in action, and I can honestly say I was scared he has no right to treat people the way he does

Incoming search terms:

• Linda Wihbey
• gerald frazee simsbury ct
• magistrates middletown ct

Court Houses in this state are being talked about, and nothing good being said about them. Lets start with the Stamford Connecticut Court, Federal laws such as the A.D.A  (Americans with Disabilities act). This law was created by the Federal Government to PROTECT people with disabilities, being disabled does NOT mean you have to be in a wheelchair. There are so many disabilities that cannot be seen but are being ignored. When someone falls under the A.D.A accommodations are SUPPOSED to be made available, and no discrimination should be used against these people. Sadly it is happening, the rights of these citizens are being abused, by being ignored.

When people talk, word spreads and what has been going on at the Superior Court for juvenile matters is alarming. Judge Mary E. Sommer allowing people to be bullied into psychological testing without the proper accommodations.  Why is it that  people are asking for assistance and they are being held in contempt for doing so?  With several Dr.s giving these evaluations Dr. Kenneth Robson, Dr. Ellen B. Schwartz and a few others. These Doctors are coming up in conversations, in actual situations people have been in with either Dr. Kenneth Robson or Dr. Ellen B. Schwartz.  An adult or a child should not fear a doctor, they should not feel uncomfortable around them either. Regardless it is happening, the pressure that is put on innocent children. To be accurate with any sort of testing with a child or adolescent suggestive questions should not be used, but they are. What is most concerning is the bias opinion these Doctors already have on some of the people they are supposed to be working with. While doing so they come up with false allegations and twist the story and actually try to convince you of what they are saying is true. Mind games, for what? These are lives, human beings, parents, children. Why pay such devious games? With life you are given choices,  why not do the right thing for people? Keeping truth in the system, and enough with the lies and games.

In the Stamford  Superior Court for Family matters the cases are heard by Honorable Judge Malone or Honorable Judge Shoefield. As a Judge upholding the law is what you swore to do. Making a mockery out of our Judicial system and our Constitutional rights. People are not being heard, because they are not allowed to speak. This is in both the juvenile and family court.  Citizens should be given the rights that so many have fought for. Is doing the right thing so wrong? Is tearing down people piece by piece common practice there? With so much talk about Family courts and with people taking a closer look at what is really going on inside them is not a bad idea. People are watching, people are tired of being bullied in these courts.

Incoming search terms:

• corrupt juvenile court stamford ct
• corruption of juvenile court system in us
• ellen b schwartz
• stamford family court look up
• stamord ct family court
• stamford ct courthouse corruption
• stamford court family matters
• list of family court judges stamford ct
• how do I get my son into juvenile detention ct
• Family Court and Stanford Connecticut