Dear Judiciary Committee
Office of the Chief Disciplinary Council
Statewide Grievance Committee
Please review the letters below from Attorney Tricia Jessica Johnson and Attorney John Quinn. The letters are very concerning as a serious crime has been committed against me. I will point out the lies:
In Attorney Johnson’s November 11, 2011 letter, she states:
1. Complainant is welcomed to have someone pick up…three boxes of discovery…but is not entitled to directly contact Respondent…
Statement: Attorney Johnson lies to the grievance panel as there is no restraining order or protective order against the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has not committed any crime
2. State records belonging to defendant Tunxis…were all returned to Complainant on September 26, 2011…
Statement: Plaintiff states that Attorney Johnson has lied. Court judicial transcripts will also show that she lied as Judge Pittmand did not order her to return any documents or money. What you will read is that the Plaintiff is asserting that her constitutional rights were violated.
3. Ms. Fore, when she filed her lawsuit in New Britain in 2007 swore that she could financially prosecute the matter and on one else…
Statement: Court documents will reveal that the Plaintiff recieved a fee waiver to file her case. The Plaintiff since the onset of her case, has represented herself in all phases of her case. The Plaintiff has kept up with all filings. The Plaintiff only hired Attorney Johnson at the advice of Judge
Shaughnessy. He recommended that the Plaintiff get an attorney just for the trial. That hearing took place in 2010.
4. The Respondents appearance was filed in October of 2010 and withdrawn in September 2011. Complainant has at all times deliberately been an obstructionist, motivated by hber ostensible desire for attention to justice.
Statement: From the onset of her hire in July 2010, Attorney Johnson has decieved the Plaintiff. She has given people the impression that she had to take on the case from start to finish. That is untrue. Records will reveal that she violated the Plaintiff’s trust and also withdrew the case from Court without the Plaintiff’s permission.
Footnote at the bottom of her letter:
Complainant conveyed to Respondent when her representation began taht the documents were rightfully in her possession when she separated from Tunxis; the Respondent has discovered otherwise subsequently, upon investigation, and on information and belief.
Statement: Not only did the Plaintiff have the documents in her possession as a state employee, the Defendants filed a Motion For A Protective Order in 2009 of which they lost because of their dishonesty. They told the Court that they “just” realized that the documents contained state employees information. This was a lie. This information was also a part of the CHRO investigation. AAG Maria Santos was involved in that process and she knew about the information.
IT IS WITH THAT INFORMATION IN THE FOOTNOTE THAT THE PLAINTIFF INFORMS EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT ATTORNEY JOHNSON HAS ADMITTED TO CONSPIRING WITH THE OPPONENTS AND HAS TURNED OVER THE PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENCE TO THE STATE. THE CASE HAS BEEN FIXED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF!!!!
Letter from Attorney John Quinn dated December 27, 2011:
Case no. #11-0779 – First question the Plaintiff has is “why is Attorney Quinn writing the Plaintiff when he has already dismissed the complaint?
The Statewide Grievance Committee said they were sending it to a “Reviewing Committee.”
Problems with his letter:
1. I have emailed you on two occasions that I was presented with two bankers boxes of file materials which belong to you. These were delivered to my office by Attorney Tricia Jessica JOhnson who had previously represented you…
Statement: First of all, “TWO BOXES.” Johnson’s letter says “THREE BOXES.”
2. To date, you have not responded…
Statement: These are state records with state employees social security numbers. Why are they being transferred from place to place without my permission? I never signed anything giving permission for the state to take my evidence in an open case.
3. It is assumed that the records you are seeking are now at my office and you are invited to come and pick them up as soon as possible.
Statement: State records are missing. I will not be an accomplice to the criminal act. Johnson admitted in her letter to Attorney Quinn that after she conducted her own investigation that she decided that I, the Plaintiff, the current rightful owner of the documents did not have a right to the documents. She nor the defendants did not have a court order from the court to make such a decision. This proves that people took it upon themselves to become the judge and decide against me. This influence has spilled over to the court wherein the judge participated and removed Attorney Johnson under fruadulent and conspiratoral agreement. The Court at all times knew that Attorney Johnson had violated my rights. More importantly, in order to protect state employees, I contacted law enforcement to report the missing documents. She knew I was trying to get my evidence back for the case. The documents are tainted as well as the case.
THIS IS A CRIME!!!!!!! Read their letters below.
Monica Fore












